Epic Research is not viewable using Internet Explorer. Please try accessing it with an alternate browser.
Cosmos Study

Cardiovascular Event Risk Increases More Sharply for Men Than Women at Very Low Average Blood Pressure

October 8, 2025
Dual-Team Study
Team A:Kersten Bartelt, RNTed Stamp
Team B:Dave Little, MDJoe Deckert, PhD

Key Findings

  • The risks of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke are increased for patients with high or low average systolic blood pressure (BP). The risks are greater at very low systolic BP than at very high systolic BP.
  • At an average systolic BP <90 mmHg, risk of hemorrhagic stroke was 166% greater in men and 67% greater in women compared to those with an average systolic BP of 115–119 mmHg. Risk of MI and ischemic stroke at very low average systolic BP was also more pronounced for men than women.

Blood pressure (BP) is a key modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Prior research has highlighted that both low BP and high BP can increase risk of adverse cardiovascular events, but less is known about whether this risk differs between men and women.1 Sex-based physiological differences, including vascular stiffness and hormonal factors, may contribute to different susceptibility to myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.2

To better understand whether there are differing cardiovascular outcomes between sexes, we studied 22,070,072 patients aged 18 to 95 who had at least one outpatient BP measurement between May 1, 2019, and April 30, 2022, to calculate a historical average BP. An additional outpatient BP measurement between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, served as the index value for stratifying patients by systolic BP levels. Patients were observed for one year for MI and stroke. We accounted for demographics, comorbidities, historical average BP, and medication use. Outcomes were defined as the first occurrence of MI, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke.

Relative risk for MI increased at both BP extremes for men and women, but the increase was more pronounced in men for very low average systolic BP. Men with an average systolic BP <90 mmHg had a 142% greater risk of MI compared to men with an average systolic BP of 115–119 mmHg. For women, the risk was 102% greater at an average systolic BP <90 mmHg compared to women with an average systolic BP of 115–119 mmHg. At ≥160 mmHg, risks were similar between men (56% greater risk) and women (55% greater risk).

Figure 1
MI Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
MI Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
Figure 1. The risk of a patient experiencing an MI stratified by their average systolic BP and sex.

Similarly, both sexes showed higher ischemic stroke risk at both BP extremes, with a greater increase in men at very low average systolic BP. At <90 mmHg, the risk was 142% higher for men and 106% higher for women (compared with an average systolic BP of 115–119). The difference between sexes was smaller at ≥160 mmHg (71% greater for men and 59% greater for women).

Figure 2
Ischemic Stroke Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
Ischemic Stroke Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
Figure 2. The risk of a patient experiencing an ischemic stroke by their average systolic BP and sex.

Men had a sharper increase in hemorrhagic stroke risk at low average systolic BP than women. At an average systolic BP <90 mmHg, men had a 166% greater risk, versus a 67% greater risk for women, compared to those with an average systolic BP of 115–119 mmHg. At the highest average BP (≥160 mmHg), risk converged (24% for men, 26% for women).

Figure 3
Hemorrhagic Stroke Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
Hemorrhagic Stroke Risk by Average Systolic BP and Sex
Figure 3. The risk of a patient experiencing a hemorrhagic stroke by their average systolic BP and sex.

These data come from Cosmos, a dataset created in collaboration with a community of Epic health systems representing more than 300 million patient records from 1,800 hospitals and more than 41,000 clinics from all 50 U.S. states, Canada, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia. This study was completed by two teams that worked independently, each composed of a clinician and research scientists. The two teams came to similar conclusions. Graphics by Brian Olson.

References

  1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: Executive summary. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269-1324. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066
  2. Ji H, Kwan AC, Chen MT, et al. Sex differences in myocardial and vascular aging. Circ Res. 2022;130(4):566-577. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319902.

Data Definitions

Study period
Study population
Censoring
Exposures
Outcomes
Confounders
Race and ethnicity
International considerations
Model specifications
Limitations