In the U.S., children are at greater risk of environmental lead exposure if they live in housing built before 1978 or in households at or below the federal poverty level.1 The water crisis in Flint, MI increased the public’s awareness of the dangers of lead exposure and the health inequities for residents in urban and low-income areas.2,3 To take a closer look, we conducted a study of U.S. children’s blood lead levels (BLLs) based on location.4 Our study population consisted of 5.6 million patients born between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, including all BLL results between birth and late June 2021. We included only areas where we had a penetrance of at least 10%. Penetrance measures how representative the sample is by comparing how many children had a face-to-face encounter documented to the number of children 0-4 years old in that location as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. We excluded locations for which there were fewer than 100 patients with birthdates between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, or where there were fewer than 50 children with documented face-to-face encounters.
As seen in Figure 1, we found there is variation across the U.S. in the proportion of children with elevated blood lead levels, defined by the CDC as greater than or equal to 5 micrograms per deciliter (µg/dL).5 Regionally, the highest percentage of kids with elevated blood lead levels were in the Midwest and Northeast, shown in Figure 2. Additionally, 16 of the top 20 areas with the highest percentage of kids with elevated lead levels were in urban settings.
blood lead levels above 5 µg/dL. Red areas indicate a greater percentage of increased blood lead levels. Uncolored
areas did not have enough data to report.
have blood lead levels above 5 µg/dL. Darker red correlates with a higher percentage of children with elevated lead
levels. Uncolored areas did not have enough data to report.
above 5 µg/dL is 5% or more and penetrance is 10% or more.
There are known variations in blood lead testing in children due to differing screening recommendations and varying levels of risk. This means children with the highest likelihood of elevated lead levels are more likely to be tested.6 Our analysis was limited to blood lead level testing and does not differentiate between testing done for screening purposes versus symptom assessment.