Inhaled insulin offers an alternative to injectable fast-acting insulin, potentially improving adherence and patient satisfaction. Approved for adults with diabetes, inhaled formulations have seen limited adoption due to concerns about pulmonary safety, variability in absorption, and cost.1,2 While clinical trials suggest similar glycemic efficacy between inhaled and injectable insulins, real-world comparative effectiveness data remain limited.1
We studied 118,940 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes who were newly prescribed injectable fast-acting insulin or inhaled insulin between January 2017 and May 2025. Patients were excluded if they had a history of smoking, asthma, COPD, or pregnancy during the study period to ensure all patients were eligible for either kind of insulin. All patients had a baseline HbA1c lab within the 12 months prior to the prescription, with the closest lab to the prescription being used if there were multiple. All included patients also had a follow-up HbA1c lab in the 3 to 12 months after the prescription was given.
We found that patients with type 1 diabetes who were prescribed inhaled insulin had an average HbA1c reduction of 0.68 percentage points, compared to 0.82 points for those on injectable insulin, as seen in Figure 1. For patients with type 2 diabetes, inhaled insulin users had an average reduction of 0.50 percentage points, while those on injectable insulin had a 0.46 percentage point reduction. Prior literature suggests a 0.5 percent point change in HbA1c between readings is considered significant.3