GLP-1 medications have become increasingly popular in recent years for managing obesity.1 Another obesity management treatment that has been an option for patients for decades is bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery works by restricting or bypassing the stomach to reduce the amount of food and caloric intake the patient has following surgery.2 We aimed to compare the benefits and risks of both treatment options.
We first analyzed weight change patterns in the year following initial treatment with either bariatric surgery or prescription of a weight-loss dosage of a GLP-1 medication. We matched patients based on sex, age, number of weight readings in the follow-up year, and BMI classification at the start of treatment. We found that patients who underwent bariatric surgery experienced significantly greater weight loss in the year following treatment and had lower rates of weight gain compared to those on one of the GLP-1 medications, as seen in Figure 1.
We further explored the proportion of patients who lost at least 15% of their starting body weight. Of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, 76% lost at least 15% of their starting body weight within one year, as seen in Figure 2. Among the patients prescribed GLP-1 medications, those who were prescribed tirzepatide experienced the greatest weight loss, with 46% losing at least 15% of their starting body weight within a year, while 30% of semaglutide patients and 8% of liraglutide patients lost at least 15% of their starting body weight.
We also examined the three-year prevalence of angina, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke among 208,692 patients on any dose of a GLP-1 medication and 208,388 patients who had bariatric surgery. We matched on patient age, sex, and BMI classification.
We found that patients who were prescribed a GLP-1 medication had higher rates of angina and MI within three years, while the rates of ischemic stroke, TIA, and hemorrhagic stroke were higher but not statistically significant, as seen in Figure 3.