In the first seven months of the novel coronavirus pandemic, inpatient therapy choices have been considerably influenced by pre-publications, media attention, clinical trials, emergency use authorizations, and regional drug availability. In this observational study, we examine patterns in inpatient medication use since the start of the pandemic. Use of the leading therapies over time represents the dramatic changes in standard of care for treating hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Dexamethasone and remdesivir are the current dominant therapeutics, and both of these therapies have supportive evidence from randomized clinical trials.1,2
Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin use were high early in the pandemic after a mid-March pre-publication from France caught global attention3 and the FDA subsequently issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).4 Hydroxychloroquine use declined sharply over the next 10 weeks as the medical and scientific community questioned its efficacy5,6 and had minimal use in hospitalized patients by the time the EUA was revoked.7 Azithromycin use had a parallel decline in April and May, but use never dropped much below 30% of hospitalized patients, possibly due to its indication for community acquired pneumonia or its known immunomodulatory effects.8 Its use did show a midsummer rise around the same time cases in the US were becoming geographically more widespread.
Clinical trials for remdesivir and dexamethasone both showed promise of improving the clinical course for patients, and these drugs showed rising ordering trends after the pre-publication announcements from their respective trials and the issuance of EUAs.9,10 Dexamethasone’s wide availability as a generic drug may have contributed to its more rapid rise in use trends than remdesivir. Convalescent plasma use began to increase after the start of the national expanded access program,11 but also saw an additional rise in midsummer. Whether this was due to changing standard of care or increasing availability of plasma as more patients convalesced is not clear from this data. Its use did not seem meaningfully impacted by the timing of the EUA in August.12
Researchers have proposed therapeutic uses of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, H2 blockers, and NSAIDs for the coronavirus via a variety of mechanisms.13,14,15 ACE inhibitor use has trended slightly upwards over time, while ARB use has not changed appreciably. H2 blocker use accelerated alongside the vasopressor use early in the pandemic, possibly representing co-ordering in critically ill ICU populations, but then persisted around 20% of inpatients through and beyond the midsummer surge. NSAID use had a significant dip after a cautionary letter was published in early March about possible harm,15 but volumes rebounded over time. The use of vasopressors for COVID-19 patients decreased in midsummer with the surge, which may indicate less severe illnesses in the hospitalized population at that time. The slight rebound of vasopressor use in later summer may represent the discharge of those less critical patients.
The standard of care appears to have stabilized over the last several months, with dexamethasone and remdesivir as the forerunners for therapy of COVID-19 inpatients.